| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
706a1
Core
Harpertown
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
80 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
November 2007
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.68k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
5.29k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.75k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
3.44k (x0.72)
TOTAL
15.39k
13.16k (x0.86)

Multithread

E5472

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
6.39k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
20.02k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
10.22k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
4.94k (x1.95)
TOTAL
44.38k
41.57k (x0.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
4.9k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
7.26k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.75k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.32k (x0.69)
TOTAL
16.62k
18.22k (x1.1)

Multithread

E5472

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
18.84k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
27.45k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
10.35k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
4.85k (x1.91)
TOTAL
48.62k
61.49k (x1.26)

Performance/W
E5472
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4