| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Celeron N3150


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.5 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
406c3
Core
Harpertown
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
November 2007
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
31.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.07k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
1.74k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
1.5k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
1.46k (x0.3)
TOTAL
15.39k
5.78k (x0.38)

Multithread

E5472

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
3.99k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
6.31k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
5.05k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.65k (x1.05)
TOTAL
44.38k
18k (x0.41)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
3.91k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
2.29k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
1.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
1.44k (x0.3)
TOTAL
16.62k
9.21k (x0.55)

Multithread

E5472

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
14.78k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
8.62k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
5.84k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.57k (x1.01)
TOTAL
48.62k
31.8k (x0.65)

Performance/W
E5472
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
5300 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4