Xeon E5472 vs Celeron E3300
Description
Both models E5472 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
1067a
Core
Harpertown
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
November 2007
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
24.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.29k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
5.87k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
2.49k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
1.01k (x0.21)
TOTAL
15.39k
11.66k (x0.76)
Multithread
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
4.57k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
11.66k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.89k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
1.04k (x0.41)
TOTAL
44.38k
22.16k (x0.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
2.9k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
6.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.59k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
1.08k (x0.22)
TOTAL
16.62k
12.94k (x0.78)
Multithread
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
5.76k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
12.67k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
5.16k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
1.01k (x0.4)
TOTAL
48.62k
24.6k (x0.51)
Performance/W
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4