Xeon E5472 vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.4 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.4 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
810f81
Core
Harpertown
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2007
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
3.63k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
16.69k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
4.92k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
5k (x1.04)
TOTAL
15.39k
30.24k (x1.97)
Multithread
E5472
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
13.62k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
65.71k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
23.7k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.64k (x2.23)
TOTAL
44.38k
108.67k (x2.45)
Performance/W
E5472
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
113 points/W
389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
1877 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
555 points/W
3105 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
763 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1950 points/GHz
4512 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
1329 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1603 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
TOTAL
5129 points/GHz
8174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4