Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Pentium G3260
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/2
TDP
130 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
11.73k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
10.45k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
4.55k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
3.83k (x1.06)
TOTAL
27.91k
30.56k (x1.1)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
22.99k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
20.53k (x0.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
8.82k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
6.55k (x0.6)
TOTAL
617.84k
58.89k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4