| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
2.34k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
9.51k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.05k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
2.59k (x0.66)
TOTAL
21.13k
17.49k (x0.83)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
4.71k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
21.73k (x0.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
7.35k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
2.43k (x0.3)
TOTAL
419.12k
36.22k (x0.09)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
8.29k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
11.82k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.09k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
4.18k (x1.16)
TOTAL
27.91k
27.39k (x0.98)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
17.24k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
27.4k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
7.44k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
4.31k (x0.39)
TOTAL
617.84k
56.39k (x0.09)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4