Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-10900K
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the i9-10900K gets 608.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0655
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12 /24
10/20
TDP
130 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
685.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
19.5k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
28.01k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
7.45k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
15.82k (x4.38)
TOTAL
27.91k
70.79k (x2.54)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
194.49k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
312.59k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
89.14k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
12.58k (x1.15)
TOTAL
617.84k
608.81k (x0.99)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
1556 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
2501 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
3751 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
5387 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1433 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
3043 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
13614 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4