| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-7700


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i7-7700 gets 200.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
906e9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
257.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.23k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
16.76k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.42k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
12.23k (x3.1)
TOTAL
21.13k
38.64k (x1.83)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
16.71k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
73.1k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
25.76k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
7.12k (x0.89)
TOTAL
419.12k
122.68k (x0.29)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
15.33k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
21.94k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.85k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
12.52k (x3.46)
TOTAL
27.91k
55.64k (x1.99)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
61.73k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
99.91k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
27.03k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
9.28k (x0.85)
TOTAL
617.84k
197.96k (x0.32)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
15.34k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
23.41k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
5.87k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
11.07k (x3.25)
TOTAL
27.92k
55.69k (x1.99)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
62.68k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
105.24k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
26.35k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
5.79k (x0.54)
TOTAL
633.14k
200.07k (x0.32)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
1619 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
405 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
3078 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5575 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
2635 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
13259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4