| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-6700K


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6700K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the i7-6700K gets 197.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.1 times faster than the i7-6700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
63.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
254.56k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.07k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
16.62k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.23k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
6.28k (x1.59)
TOTAL
21.13k
32.2k (x1.52)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
16.37k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
77.34k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
25.65k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
10.21k (x1.28)
TOTAL
419.12k
129.57k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
14.73k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
21.27k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.52k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
6.32k (x1.75)
TOTAL
27.91k
47.84k (x1.71)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
61.09k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
99.17k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
26.57k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
10.26k (x0.93)
TOTAL
617.84k
197.09k (x0.32)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
643 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
1044 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
280 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
2075 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
3508 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
5065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1505 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
11391 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4