Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-4702MQ
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 5.5 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 5.5 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4 /8
TDP
130 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
145.15k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
3.45k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
8.53k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.99k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.51k (x0.89)
TOTAL
21.13k
19.47k (x0.92)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
11.93k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
42.4k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
18k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.6k (x0.45)
TOTAL
419.12k
75.92k (x0.18)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
323 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
2052 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
2665 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
6085 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4