| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-9300H


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i5-9300H gets 80.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 5.2 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
3.38k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
12.84k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.6k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
6.23k (x1.58)
TOTAL
21.13k
27.05k (x1.28)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
11.6k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
48.01k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
17.05k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.88k (x0.49)
TOTAL
419.12k
80.54k (x0.19)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
1067 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
379 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
1790 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
1519 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
6597 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4