| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 134.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
906e9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/4
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
3.41k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
14.14k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.41k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
8.87k (x2.25)
TOTAL
21.13k
30.83k (x1.46)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
12.75k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
52.88k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
16.25k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
8.98k (x1.12)
TOTAL
419.12k
90.85k (x0.22)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
11.71k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
16.74k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
4.27k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
7.81k (x2.16)
TOTAL
27.91k
40.53k (x1.45)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
44.38k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
62.55k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
15.6k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
7.85k (x0.71)
TOTAL
617.84k
130.38k (x0.21)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
11.59k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
17.89k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
4.14k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.88k (x2.32)
TOTAL
27.92k
41.5k (x1.49)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
44.42k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
67.5k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
14.6k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
8.06k (x0.76)
TOTAL
633.14k
134.58k (x0.21)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
987 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
324 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
2991 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3310 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4