| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.7 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
67.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
2.02k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
8.2k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
2.63k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.92k (x1)
TOTAL
21.13k
16.77k (x0.79)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
3.83k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
17.17k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
5.77k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.62k (x0.45)
TOTAL
419.12k
30.39k (x0.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
7.28k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
10.51k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
2.81k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
2.88k (x0.8)
TOTAL
27.91k
23.48k (x0.84)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
14.98k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
23.68k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
6.37k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
2.43k (x0.22)
TOTAL
617.84k
47.46k (x0.08)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
7.34k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
11.37k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
2.74k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.08k (x0.9)
TOTAL
27.92k
24.53k (x0.88)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
15.32k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
25.61k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
6.36k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
2.58k (x0.24)
TOTAL
633.14k
49.87k (x0.08)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4