Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12 /24
2/2
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2013
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
49.34k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
2.36k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
9.79k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.08k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.36k (x0.85)
TOTAL
21.13k
18.59k (x0.88)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
4.45k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
18.16k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
5.48k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.5k (x0.44)
TOTAL
419.12k
31.59k (x0.08)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
8.56k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
12.25k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.17k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
3.35k (x0.93)
TOTAL
27.91k
27.33k (x0.98)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
16.42k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
23.61k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
5.75k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
3.55k (x0.32)
TOTAL
617.84k
49.34k (x0.08)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4