| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the 2700X gets 412.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f82
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
12 /24
8/16
TDP
130 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.25k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
19.72k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.84k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
21.36k (x5.42)
TOTAL
21.13k
51.17k (x2.42)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
35.04k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
181.42k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
64.86k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
8.21k (x1.03)
TOTAL
419.12k
289.54k (x0.69)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
15.22k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
24.12k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.87k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
21k (x5.81)
TOTAL
27.91k
66.21k (x2.37)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
126.81k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
229.86k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
61.74k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
9.77k (x0.89)
TOTAL
617.84k
428.19k (x0.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
14.44k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
24.92k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
5.8k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
19.07k (x5.6)
TOTAL
27.92k
64.24k (x2.3)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
122.01k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
220.34k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
59.89k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
9.9k (x0.93)
TOTAL
633.14k
412.13k (x0.65)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1162 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
2099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
3925 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5796 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
4435 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
14939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4