| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the 1800X gets 389.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
12 /24
8/16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.14k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
19.07k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.77k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
18.28k (x4.64)
TOTAL
21.13k
47.26k (x2.24)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
34.48k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
169.65k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
63.68k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
8.2k (x1.03)
TOTAL
419.12k
276.01k (x0.66)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
15.11k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
23.46k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
5.64k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
17.52k (x5.15)
TOTAL
27.92k
61.72k (x2.21)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
119.5k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
198.79k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
59.75k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
11.58k (x1.09)
TOTAL
633.14k
389.62k (x0.62)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
2092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
4101 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5866 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1409 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
4379 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
15430 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4