Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-12900KF
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 491 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.3 times faster than the i9-12900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 491 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.3 times faster than the i9-12900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
90672
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12 /24
16/24
TDP
130 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2013
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
1219.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
28.96k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
30k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
16.94k (x4.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
17.14k (x5.04)
TOTAL
27.92k
93.05k (x3.33)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
166.25k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
172.03k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
96.95k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
55.78k (x5.23)
TOTAL
633.14k
491.01k (x0.78)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
1376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
776 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
3928 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
5568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
3258 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
17894 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4