Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 728.5 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 728.5 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
870f10
Core
Haswell-EP
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
135 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.08k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.48k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.63k
17.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
10.9k
26.59k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
8.91k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.23k
23.21k (x7.18)
TOTAL
38.08k
75.81k (x1.99)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
379.6k
172.04k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
244.5k
214.03k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.5k
97.1k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
14.57k (x1.85)
TOTAL
728.48k
497.74k (x0.68)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2812 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1811 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
715 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5396 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5607 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3115 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
924 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
10881 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4