Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i7-7700K
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-7700K gets 238 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700K is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-7700K gets 238 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700K is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906e9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
76.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
289.82k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
17.55k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
27.82k (x3.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
6.8k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
14.83k (x4.47)
TOTAL
23.28k
67k (x2.88)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
68.4k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
118.8k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
33.34k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
17.43k (x4.5)
TOTAL
185.26k
237.97k (x1.28)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
720 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
351 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
184 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
2505 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3900 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
6183 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1510 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
3296 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4