Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i7-7700
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-7700 gets 200.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-7700 gets 200.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906e9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
257.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
15.34k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
23.41k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5.87k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
11.07k (x3.33)
TOTAL
23.28k
55.69k (x2.39)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
62.68k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
105.24k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
26.35k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
5.79k (x1.49)
TOTAL
185.26k
200.07k (x1.08)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1619 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
405 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
3078 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5575 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2635 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
13259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4