Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 151.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 151.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806ec
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2012
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
143.23k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
13.66k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
21.17k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
8.11k (x2.44)
TOTAL
23.28k
47.94k (x2.06)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
51.36k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
79.72k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
16.61k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.75k (x0.97)
TOTAL
185.26k
151.44k (x0.82)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
3424 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
5314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
10096 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2081 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
12293 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4