Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-7300U
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806e9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
109.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
9.85k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
17.37k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.98k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
5.11k (x1.54)
TOTAL
23.28k
36.31k (x1.56)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
25.37k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
43.43k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
10.62k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
5.4k (x1.39)
TOTAL
185.26k
84.82k (x0.46)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
5655 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4