| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-5675R


Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-5675R gets 156.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
40671
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/4
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2012
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
194.2k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
12.88k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
18.27k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5.12k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
5.45k (x1.64)
TOTAL
23.28k
41.72k (x1.79)

Multithread

E5-2690 0

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
49.91k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
70.3k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
19.69k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
16.92k (x4.37)
TOTAL
185.26k
156.83k (x0.85)

Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
768 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
260 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
2413 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3578 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1422 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
11589 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4