| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-3337U gets 48.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.8 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2 /2
TDP
135 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
48.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
8.64k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
8.55k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.42k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.22k (x0.97)
TOTAL
23.28k
23.82k (x1.02)

Multithread

E5-2690 0

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
17.28k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
19.67k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
7.59k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.75k (x0.97)
TOTAL
185.26k
48.3k (x0.26)

Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
2841 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
8824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4