| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-3317U


Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 4.5 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2 /2
TDP
135 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
41.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
6.11k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
6.58k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
2.48k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.71k (x0.82)
TOTAL
23.28k
17.88k (x0.77)

Multithread

E5-2690 0

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
13.67k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
16.8k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
6.66k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.17k (x1.08)
TOTAL
185.26k
41.31k (x0.22)

Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
2430 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4