Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0653
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8 /16
6/12
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
307.18k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
12.5k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
19.05k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
4.72k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
10.3k (x3.1)
TOTAL
23.28k
46.57k (x2)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
74.58k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
126.96k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
31.76k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.5k (x0.64)
TOTAL
185.26k
235.8k (x1.27)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4