Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
706e5
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2012
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
142.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
13.9k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
20.13k (x2.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
9.41k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
10.59k (x3.19)
TOTAL
23.28k
54.03k (x2.32)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
55.4k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
59.01k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
22.83k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
6.7k (x1.73)
TOTAL
185.26k
143.94k (x0.78)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
3934 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1522 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
9596 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3757 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2862 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
14601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4