Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
40651
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
46.09k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
6.4k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
6.2k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
2.5k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.05k (x0.62)
TOTAL
23.28k
17.15k (x0.74)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
12.86k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
15.12k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
5.76k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.15k (x0.55)
TOTAL
185.26k
35.88k (x0.19)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
1008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
143 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
2392 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
3263 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
9024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4