Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i3-3240
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-3240 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.7 times faster than the i3-3240 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
306a9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/4
TDP
135 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
24.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
49.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
8.46k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
10.69k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.09k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.23k (x0.67)
TOTAL
23.28k
24.48k (x1.05)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
17.92k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
21.21k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
7.77k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.8k (x0.72)
TOTAL
185.26k
49.7k (x0.27)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
326 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
904 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
2490 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
7200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4