Xeon E5-2690 0 vs FX 6300
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 6300 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.8 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.8 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
600f20
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8 /16
6/6
TDP
135 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
23.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
66.43k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
7.71k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
7.41k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
2.81k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
5.2k (x1.56)
TOTAL
23.28k
23.14k (x0.99)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
25.2k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
25.83k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
11.47k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.92k (x1.01)
TOTAL
185.26k
66.43k (x0.36)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
699 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
1951 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
6088 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4