Xeon E5-2690 0 vs A10 7700K
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 7700K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.2 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.2 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
630f01
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaveri
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/4
TDP
135 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
21.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
57.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
7.33k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
7.99k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
2.91k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.15k (x0.95)
TOTAL
23.28k
21.38k (x0.92)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
23.06k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
20.11k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
10.44k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.28k (x1.1)
TOTAL
185.26k
57.89k (x0.31)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
1929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
2101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
5625 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4