Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 247.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 247.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
90675
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
330.62k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
22.25k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
23.16k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
13.09k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
13.21k (x3.98)
TOTAL
23.28k
71.7k (x3.08)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
77.43k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
109.08k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
52.45k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
8.75k (x2.26)
TOTAL
185.26k
247.71k (x1.34)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
2212 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
3117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1499 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
7077 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
5426 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5649 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
3192 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
3222 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
17489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4