Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806c1
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
210.4k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
16.27k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
25.74k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
11.5k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
10.82k (x3.26)
TOTAL
23.28k
64.32k (x2.76)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
54k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
88.76k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
35.23k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
12.14k (x3.13)
TOTAL
185.26k
190.12k (x1.03)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
6790 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4