Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-1135G7
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 157.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 157.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806c1
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8 /16
4/8
TDP
135 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
237.55k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
15.12k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
23.4k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
10.9k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
9.41k (x2.84)
TOTAL
23.28k
58.83k (x2.53)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
45.69k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
74.42k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
29.8k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
7.16k (x1.85)
TOTAL
185.26k
157.08k (x0.85)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1632 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
2658 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1064 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
256 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
5610 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
2595 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2242 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
14007 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4