Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a0655
Core
Broadwell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/28
10/20
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
35.87k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
31.43k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
7.34k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
15.73k (x6.14)
TOTAL
41.35k
90.37k (x2.19)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
377.56k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
347.59k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
88.08k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
12.24k (x0.59)
TOTAL
1162.63k
825.47k (x0.71)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4