Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i5-4460
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 8.3 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-4460 gets 140.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 8.3 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
306c3
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/4
TDP
120 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2016
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
39.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
140.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
19.84k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
10.86k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.46k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
4.39k (x1.71)
TOTAL
41.35k
39.53k (x0.96)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
75.08k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
42.36k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
16.38k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
6.45k (x0.31)
TOTAL
1162.63k
140.27k (x0.12)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
894 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
504 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
1670 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
3193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
11628 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4