| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i3-7130U


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 12.8 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
806e9
Core
Broadwell-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
14/28
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2016
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
90.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
17.82k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
16.18k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.76k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
4.24k (x1.65)
TOTAL
41.35k
42k (x1.02)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
40.25k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
37.4k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
9.07k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
4.17k (x0.2)
TOTAL
1162.63k
90.89k (x0.08)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
6059 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4