Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i3-5005U
Description
Both models E5-2680 v4 and i3-5005U are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 21.1 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 21.1 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
306d4
Core
Broadwell-EP
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
14/28
2 /2
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
54.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
11.08k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
9.5k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
2.51k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
2.52k (x0.98)
TOTAL
41.35k
25.61k (x0.62)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
23.11k (x0.05)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
22.79k (x0.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
6.06k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
3.03k (x0.15)
TOTAL
1162.63k
54.99k (x0.05)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
5541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
4749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
12804 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4