Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 8.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 8.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
810f81
Core
Broadwell-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
140.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
10.88k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
18.09k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.29k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
3.36k (x1.31)
TOTAL
41.35k
36.64k (x0.89)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
42.44k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
73.82k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
20.76k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
3.96k (x0.19)
TOTAL
1162.63k
140.97k (x0.12)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4