| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 14.9 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
810f81
Core
Broadwell-EP
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
14/28
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
9.33k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
17.1k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.57k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
3.26k (x1.27)
TOTAL
41.35k
33.26k (x0.8)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
22.14k (x0.04)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
40.04k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
10.71k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
5k (x0.24)
TOTAL
1162.63k
77.88k (x0.07)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4