| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 9.9 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
800f11
Core
Broadwell-EP
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/4
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
11.73k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
18.85k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.22k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
2.76k (x1.08)
TOTAL
41.35k
37.55k (x0.91)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
38.56k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
62.21k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
13.7k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
3.33k (x0.16)
TOTAL
1162.63k
117.81k (x0.1)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4