| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1847.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
b0671
Core
Broadwell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Broadwell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
24/32
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2016
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
132.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
1847.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
60.21k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
33.14k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
17.81k (x3.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
21.18k (x8.26)
TOTAL
41.35k
132.34k (x3.2)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
861.66k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
626.76k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
334.12k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
25.33k (x1.22)
TOTAL
1162.63k
1847.86k (x1.59)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
6893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
5014 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
2673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
14783 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
10381 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
3071 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
22818 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4