Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
90675
Core
Broadwell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
6/12
TDP
120 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
33.85k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
20.33k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
10.51k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
11.77k (x4.59)
TOTAL
41.35k
76.46k (x1.85)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
174.21k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
141.31k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
64.86k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
19.01k (x0.91)
TOTAL
1162.63k
399.39k (x0.34)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4