Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Pentium 4405U
Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4405U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 537 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 537 k points while the 4405U gets 51.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 10.5 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
23.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
51.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
7.45k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
10.51k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
2.78k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.59k (x0.6)
TOTAL
31.6k
23.33k (x0.74)
Multithread
E5-2680 v2
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
16.1k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
25.44k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
6.99k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
2.58k (x0.23)
TOTAL
536.99k
51.1k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
1898 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1799 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
873 points/W
466 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
3407 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
4405U
Test#1 (Integers)
3323 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2982 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1324 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1197 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
TOTAL
8777 points/GHz
11109 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4