| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i7-4790K


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i7-4790K gets 164.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.4 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/8
TDP
115 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
215.47k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
15.6k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
13.92k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
6.12k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
31.6k
40.65k (x1.29)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
65.48k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
63.29k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
27.93k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
7.84k (x0.68)
TOTAL
536.99k
164.54k (x0.31)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
15.8k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
14.35k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.97k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
5.17k (x1.41)
TOTAL
28.23k
41.29k (x1.46)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
62.79k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
66.48k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
26.35k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.74k (x1)
TOTAL
551.1k
164.36k (x0.3)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
713 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1868 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1174 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
9383 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4