Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i5-4590S
Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-4590S is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-4590S gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-4590S gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 4.7 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/4
TDP
115 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
34.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
117.77k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
13.19k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
12.31k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.98k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
4.27k (x1.17)
TOTAL
28.23k
34.75k (x1.23)
Multithread
E5-2680 v2
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
47.15k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
44.1k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
17.93k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
8.6k (x0.98)
TOTAL
551.1k
117.77k (x0.21)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
725 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
678 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
276 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
132 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3564 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1345 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
9391 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4