| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
706e5
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/8
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
142.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
7.07k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
10.55k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.27k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
5.66k (x1.31)
TOTAL
31.6k
28.56k (x0.9)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
25.28k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
37.48k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
17.77k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
6.92k (x0.6)
TOTAL
536.99k
87.45k (x0.16)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
13.9k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
20.13k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.41k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
10.59k (x2.89)
TOTAL
28.23k
54.03k (x1.91)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
55.4k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
59.01k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
22.83k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
6.7k (x0.76)
TOTAL
551.1k
143.94k (x0.26)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
3934 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
1522 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
9596 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3757 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
2862 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
14601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4