| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
106.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
14.3k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
20.09k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.23k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.24k (x0.99)
TOTAL
31.6k
43.87k (x1.39)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
25.51k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
41.33k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
10.81k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
3.21k (x0.28)
TOTAL
536.99k
80.85k (x0.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
14.25k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
21.55k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.16k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
4.26k (x1.16)
TOTAL
28.23k
45.22k (x1.6)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
26.15k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
44.03k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
10.71k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
3.28k (x0.37)
TOTAL
551.1k
84.17k (x0.15)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1743 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
218 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
5611 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5256 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1258 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
11029 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4