| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core M-5Y10c


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 10.8 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
51k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
7.22k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
9.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.75k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
2.98k (x0.82)
TOTAL
28.23k
22.93k (x0.81)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
15.07k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
24.8k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
6.68k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
4.46k (x0.51)
TOTAL
551.1k
51k (x0.09)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4