| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 2.9 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
10 /20
4/8
TDP
115 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
198.27k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
13.95k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
20.7k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.33k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.03k (x0.7)
TOTAL
31.6k
43.01k (x1.36)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
58.56k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
92.95k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
28.55k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
2.98k (x0.26)
TOTAL
536.99k
183.04k (x0.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
13.04k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
22.35k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.37k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
3.4k (x0.93)
TOTAL
28.23k
44.15k (x1.56)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
56.49k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
100.74k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
28.21k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
3.04k (x0.35)
TOTAL
551.1k
188.49k (x0.34)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
2900 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4